- Trainer/in: Tina Junge
- Trainer/in: Tanja Tröger
- Trainer/in: Helga Unseld
Suchergebnisse: 545
- Trainer/in: Tina Junge
- Trainer/in: Tina Junge
- Trainer/in: Milena Damrau
- Trainer/in: Stefan Ufer
- Trainer/in: Simon Weixler
- Trainer/in: Milena Damrau
- Trainer/in: Alexander Rachel
- Trainer/in: Milena Damrau
- Trainer/in: Christian Lindermayer
Basic Information
- Language: English
- Prerequisite courses
- Formal Languages and Complexity (must)
- Logic and Discrete Structures (must)
- Formal Specification and Verification (recommended)
- Software Verification (recommended)
- SAT Solving (recommended)
- Date: Thursday, 10:15-11:45
- Location: Seminar Room 133, Oettingenstr. 67
- First meeting: 2024-04-18 (about the detailed seminar organization and expectations)
Content
Model checking is an important research field in computer science where automatic solutions to the following problem are studied: Given a computational model and a specification, decide whether the model satisfies the specification or not. In practice, a computational model can be a digital circuit (hardware) or a program (software). A specification can be a safety property requiring that errors never happen during the execution of the model. Compared to testing, model checking can guarantee the correctness of a computational model with mathematical rigor. Model checking is rooted in a solid theoretical foundation and requires advanced software engineering for tool implementation. The inventors of model checking won the 2007 Turing Award, and leading technology companies use model-checking techniques to assure the quality of their products.
Goal
The goal of this seminar is to learn the mathematical foundation and understand the working of state-of-the-art algorithms for hardware and software model checking. At the end of this seminar, students should become familiar with the background knowledge of model checking and able to explain a scientific publication on model checking in oral and written forms.
Organization
The seminar will consist of three phases:
- Reading sessions: In the first phase, we will recap the mathematical foundation of model checking. Students will be divided into groups. Each group will be assigned a topic and lead the discussion on the topic in one seminar session.
- Weekly meetings: In the second phase, each student will be assigned a publication on an algorithm for model checking. Students will have weekly meetings with the mentors to report their progress. Mentors will guide students to read and understand the algorithms in the publications.
- Final presentation and report: In the final phase, students will present the algorithms assigned to them and write a report explaining them with examples and analysis.
Team
References
- Trainer/in: Dirk Beyer
- Trainer/in: Po-Chun Chien
- Trainer/in: Niann-Tzer Li
Basic Information
- Language: English
- Prerequisite courses
- Formal Languages and Complexity (must)
- Logic and Discrete Structures (must)
- Formal Specification and Verification (recommended)
- Software Verification (recommended)
- SAT Solving (recommended)
- Date: Thursday, 16:15-17:45
- Location: Seminar Room 067, Oettingenstr. 67
- First meeting: 2023-10-19 (about the detailed seminar organization and expectations)
- IMPORTANT: Absence from the first meeting will lead to a failing grade in the seminar.
Content
Model checking is an important research field in computer science where automatic solutions to the following problem are studied: Given a computing model and a specification, decide whether the model satisfies the specification or not. In practice, a computing model can be a digital circuit (hardware) or a program (software). A specification can be a safety property requiring that errors never happen during the execution of the computing model. Compared to testing, model checking can guarantee the correctness of computing systems with mathematical rigor. Model checking is rooted in a solid theoretical foundation and requires advanced software engineering for tool implementation. The inventors of model checking won the 2007 Turing Award, and leading technology companies use model-checking techniques to assure the quality of their products.
Goal
The goal of this seminar is to learn the mathematical foundation and understand the working of state-of-the-art algorithms for hardware and software model checking. At the end of this seminar, students should become familiar with the background knowledge of model checking and able to explain a scientific publication on model checking in oral and written forms.
Organization
The seminar will consist of three phases:
- Reading lectures: In the first phase, we will recap the mathematical foundation of model checking. Students will be divided into groups. Each group will be assigned a topic and lead the discussion on the topic in one seminar session.
- Weekly group meetings: In the second phase, each student will be assigned a publication on an algorithm for model checking. Students will have weekly meetings with the mentors to report their progress. Mentors will guide students to read and understand the algorithms in the publications.
- Final presentation and report: In the final phase, students will present the algorithms assigned to them and write a report explaining them with examples and analysis.
Team
References
- Trainer/in: Dirk Beyer
- Trainer/in: Po-Chun Chien
- Trainer/in: Niann-Tzer Li
The seminar on Data Ethics is part of the MSc Data Science program at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich. The course will be lead by Prof. Dr. Dieter Kranzlmüller and Fabio Genz.
Contents: The seminar is one part of the module Data Ethics and Data Security, which covers basic legal and ethical questions and challenges of data security. This course helps the students to prepare lectures on ethical and legal aspects of data ethics. Students are introduced to the technical, legal, and ethical issues of data security, especially when dealing with personal data or when planning experiments in Data Science.
Objective: Students will reflect on standard procedures and problems of data protection and learn technical methods to handle data responsibly.

- Trainer/in: Fabio Genz
- Trainer/in: Dieter Kranzlmüller
The seminar on Data Ethics is part of the MSc Data Science program at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich. The course will be lead by Prof. Dr. Dieter Kranzlmüller and Fabio Genz.
Contents: The seminar is one part of the module Data Ethics and Data Security, which covers basic legal and ethical questions and challenges of data security. This course helps the students to prepare lectures on ethical and legal aspects of data ethics. Students are introduced to the technical, legal, and ethical issues of data security, especially when dealing with personal data or when planning experiments in Data Science.
Objective: Students will reflect on standard procedures and problems of data protection and learn technical methods to handle data responsibly.

- Trainer/in: Fabio Genz
- Trainer/in: Dieter Kranzlmüller
The seminar on Data Ethics is part of the MSc Data Science program at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich. The course will be lead by Prof. Dr. Dieter Kranzlmüller and Fabio Genz.
Contents: The seminar is one part of the module Data Ethics and Data Security, which covers basic legal and ethical questions and challenges of data security. This course helps the students to prepare lectures on ethical and legal aspects of data ethics. Students are introduced to the technical, legal, and ethical issues of data security, especially when dealing with personal data or when planning experiments in Data Science.
Objective: Students will reflect on standard procedures and problems of data protection and learn technical methods to handle data responsibly.
- Trainer/in: Fabio Genz
- Trainer/in: Dieter Kranzlmüller
The seminar on Data Ethics is part of the MSc Data Science program at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich. The course will be lead by Prof. Dr. Dieter Kranzlmüller and Fabio Genz.
Contents: The seminar is one part of the module Data Ethics and Data Security, which covers basic legal and ethical questions and challenges of data security. This course helps the students to prepare lectures on ethical and legal aspects of data ethics. Students are introduced to the technical, legal, and ethical issues of data security, especially when dealing with personal data or when planning experiments in Data Science.
Objective: Students will reflect on standard procedures and problems of data protection and learn technical methods to handle data responsibly.
- Trainer/in: Fabio Genz
- Trainer/in: Dieter Kranzlmüller
- Trainer/in: Michael Windmann
- Trainer/in: Tobias Rolfes
- Trainer/in: Simon Weixler
Gödel's incompleteness theorems are celebrated results in mathematical logic that significantly impact on computing. A seminar's first aim is to get a grasp of Gödel's incompleteness theorems' proofs. A seminar's second aim ist to directly approach Gödel's incompleteness theorems from Gödel's article of 1938, helped if needed from introduction to (modern version of) the proofs of Gödel's incompleteness theorems. The seminar's third and last aim ist to grasp the meaning of Gödel's incompleteness theorems - and to debunk some widespread esoteric "understandings" of these theorems.
- Trainer/in: Francois Bry
Some algorithms from machine learning have successfully approached many of the problems that seemed unsolvable a few decades ago (eg. computer vision, image generation). Irrespective of the successes in applied settings, the learning process, as well as the uncertainties that underlie the learning, remain open problems that challenge the foundations of statistics. Since attempts relying on the traditional (Bayesian and frequentist) frameworks have shown only limited success, some researchers have directed their efforts in questioning the foundations of statistics in a very principled manner (eg. What if there is no data generating process? What if we are not certain about our prior beliefs? Can we talk about a conditional distribution of the parameters without imposing a prior on the parameters? Are all uncertainty dimensions covered?).
In this seminar, we will explore foundations rooted in five main blocks, namely: traditional Bayesian and frequentist frameworks, imprecise probability, decision theory, information theory and compression algorithms. We will build on the following non-exhaustive list of papers:
1. Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: An introduction to concepts and methods - Hüllermeier, Waegeman (2021)
2. Sources of Uncertainty in Machine Learning--A Statisticians' View - Gruber et al. (2023)
3. Minimum description length revisited - Grünwald and Roos (2020)
4. The Interplay of Bayesian and Frequentist Analysis - Bayarri and Berger (2004)
5. Robust Bayesian Analysis: sensitivity to prior - Berger (1987)
6. All models are wrong, but many are useful: Learning a variable's importance by studying an entire class of prediction models simultaneously - Fisher et al. (2019)
7. Strictly frequentist imprecise probability - Fröhlich et al. (2024)
8. Information-theoretic upper and lower bounds for statistical estimation - Zhang (2006)
9. The E-Posterior - Grünwald (2023)
10. How the game-theoretic foundation for probability resolves the Bayesian vs. frequentist standoff? - Shafer (2020)
11. Judicious Judgement Meets Unsettling Updating: Dilation, Sure Loss and Simpson’s Paradox - Gong and Meng (2021)
12. Testing by betting: A strategy for statistical and scientific communication - Shafer (2019)
We invite students to suggest their own papers that fit within the topic as well.
Who is this seminar for: Motivated students who are open to explore current trends in the foundations of statistics that might provide tools to solve open problems in uncertainty quantification and learning. The seminar is open to master’s students from statistics, mathematics, economics, data science, and similar backgrounds. For students of the Statistics and Data Science program, the seminar can be recognized for the mandatory seminar module in the Methodology & Modeling, Machine Learning and Social Statistics and Data Science tracks, as well as for the additional elective general seminar module ‘Advanced Research Methods in Theoretical Statistics’ (WP 51).
Data Science tracks, as well as for the additional elective general seminar module ‘Advanced Research Methods in Theoretical Statistics’ (WP 51). Requirements for obtaining 9 ECTS credits: Every student has to
* give a 45-60 minutes long presentation on their chosen topic supported by slides and
* write a seminar paper based on it (As a rough guideline: the typical seminar paper is 25-30 pages long; in case the paper is very technical, it can be considerably shorter, which is to be agreed on with the organisers of the seminar). The paper has to be submitted by 01.06.2025 and shall contain a deepened and extended version of the presentation, also taking up the discussion of the presentation and positioning the chosen topic in the context of the seminar. (The registration for the 9 ECTS has to be done via LSF.)
If places are left, we are happy to offer in addition a 3 ECTS version, based on a shorter term paper or presentation. The 3 ECTS could be used flexibly for one of the corresponding generic modules. To apply for the 3 ECTS option write an email to ivan.melev@lmu.de no later than September 25 (no registration via LSF!).
We expect active participation in the discussions of the seminar. This includes a quick personal preparation for each presentation based on some preparation material (1 page) the speakers are asked to provide one week in advance.
What is the format? This is a block seminar in a face-to-face format. It will take place during the week of 26.02.2025-28.02.2025; the exact dates are still to be decided.
- Trainer/in: Thomas Augustin
- Trainer/in: Ivan Melev
- Trainer/in: Georg Schollmeyer
This course covers advanced techniques for automatic software verification, especially those in the field of software model checking. It continues the Bachelor course Formal Verification and Specification (FSV). Knowledge from FSV is helpful but not mandatory. This course can be used for the specialization "Programming, Software Verification, and Logic" in the MSc computer science (cf. German site on specializations).
Topics
The course will cover the following topics:
- Mathematical foundation for software verification
- Configurable program analysis
- Strongest postcondition
- Predicate abstraction with a fixed precision
- Craig interpolation and abstraction refinement (CEGAR)
- Predicate abstraction with precision adjustment
- Bounded model checking and k-induction
- Observer automata
- Verification witnesses
- Test generation and symbolic execution
- Cooperative verification
- Project: implementing a software verifier (2 weeks)
Reference Materials
- Combining Model Checking and Data-Flow Analysis (Chapter 16 in the Handbook of Model Checking)
- A Unifying View on SMT-Based Software Verification
Organization
The course consists of weekly lectures and tutorials. Important announcements are sent via Moodle messages.
Time Slots and Rooms
- Lecture: 08:15 - 09:45, Wednesday, in Room 061, Oettingenstr. 67 (by Prof. Dr. Dirk Beyer)
- Tutorial: 14:15 - 15:45, Thursday, in C 022, HGB (by Marek Jankola and Niann-Tzer Li, Ph.D.)
The first lecture session on 2024-04-17 will be about the detailed course organization and expectations. The first tutorial session will be on 2024-04-18.
Enrolment
Please enroll yourself with the key: t1/F0al,KdUzqgbf6-JW
- Trainer/in: Dirk Beyer
- Trainer/in: Marek Jankola
- Trainer/in: Niann-Tzer Li
This course covers advanced techniques for automatic software verification, especially those in the field of software model checking. It continues the Bachelor course Formal Verification and Specification (FSV). Knowledge from FSV is helpful but not mandatory. This course can be used for the specialization "Programming, Software Verification, and Logic" in the MSc computer science (cf. German site on specializations).
Topics
The course will cover the following topics:
- Mathematical foundation for software verification
- Configurable program analysis
- Strongest postcondition
- Predicate abstraction with a fixed precision
- Craig interpolation and abstraction refinement (CEGAR)
- Predicate abstraction with precision adjustment
- Bounded model checking and k-induction
- Observer automata
- Verification witnesses
- Test generation and symbolic execution
- Cooperative verification
- Project: implementing a software verifier (2 weeks)
Reference Materials
- Combining Model Checking and Data-Flow Analysis (Chapter 16 in the Handbook of Model Checking)
- A Unifying View on SMT-Based Software Verification
Organization
The course consists of weekly lectures and tutorials. Important announcements are sent via Moodle messages.
Time Slots and Rooms
- Lecture: 10:15 - 12:00, Wednesday, in M 101, HGB (by Dr. Thomas Lemberger)
- Tutorial: 14:15 - 15:45, Thursday, in D Z007, HGB (by Marek Jankola)
The first lecture session on 2025-05-07 will be about the detailed course organization and expectations. The first tutorial session will be on 2025-04-24.
Enrollment
Please enroll with the following key: wr$NUB#L9Zvl0&W37Ynx
- Trainer/in: Dirk Beyer
- Trainer/in: Marek Jankola
- Trainer/in: Thomas Lemberger
This course covers advanced techniques for automatic software verification, especially those in the field of software model checking. Knowledge from the Bachelor course Formal Verification and Specification (FSV) is helpful but not mandatory. This course can be used for the specialization "Programming, Software Verification, and Logic" in the MSc computer science (cf. German site on specializations).
Topics
The course covers the following topics:
- Mathematical foundation for software verification
- Configurable program analysis
- Strongest postcondition
- Predicate abstraction with a fixed precision
- Craig interpolation and abstraction refinement (CEGAR)
- Predicate abstraction with precision adjustment
- Bounded model checking and k-induction
- Observer automata
- Verification witnesses
- Test generation and symbolic execution
- LTL and Liveness analysis
- Model Checking for Computational Tree Logic
Reference Materials
- Combining Model Checking and Data-Flow Analysis (Chapter 16 in the Handbook of Model Checking)
- A Unifying View on SMT-Based Software Verification
Organization
The course consists of weekly lectures and tutorials. Important announcements are sent via Moodle messages.
Time Slots and Rooms
- Lecture: Wednesday, 10:00 - 12:00 (s.t., full 2 hours), Geschw.-Scholl-Pl. 1 (D) D Z005, by Thomas Lemberger
- Tutorial: Thursday, 14:15 - 15:45, Geschw.-Scholl-Pl. 1 (D) D Z005, by Marek Jankola
The first lecture is on 2026-04-15. The first tutorial session will be on 2026-04-16.
Enrollment
Please enroll with the following key: cQPHz&lj7f8MjTSn2hgS
- Trainer/in: Dirk Beyer
- Trainer/in: Marek Jankola
- Trainer/in: Thomas Lemberger
- Trainer/in: Thomas Ehring
- Trainer/in: Antonia Nauerz
- Trainer/in: Ana Semm
Course Description
In this lecture, we will consider various classes of stochastic processes that may differ in their state spaces and underlying index sets with a special focus on Gaussian, Lévy and Markov processes. In summary, the lecture will be divided into three core topics: the construction, the path behaviour and the probabilistic analysis of general stochastic processes.
Target Participants
- Master students of Mathematics and Financial and Insurance Mathematics
Pre-requisites
- Probability theory and measure and integration theory
Registration key
- Processes
- Trainer/in: Alexander Kalinin
Course Description
In this lecture, we will consider various classes of stochastic processes that may differ in their state spaces and underlying index sets with a special focus on Gaussian, Lévy and Markov processes. In summary, the lecture will be divided into three core topics: the construction, the path behaviour and the probabilistic analysis of general stochastic processes.
Target Participants
- Master students of Mathematics and Financial and Insurance Mathematics
Pre-requisites
- Probability theory and measure and integration theory
- Trainer/in: Alexander Kalinin
Testkurs zur Einarbeitung der Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter des Mathematischen Instituts
- Trainer/in: Adalbert Fono
- Trainer/in: Gitta Kutyniok
For more information, please see here.
- Trainer/in: Adalbert Fono
- Trainer/in: Gitta Kutyniok
- Trainer/in: Stefan Kolek Martinez de Azagra
- Trainer/in: Mariia Seleznova
Dieser öffentlich zugängliche Kurs wird für das Tutorienprojekt des Mathematischen Instituts benötigt.
Für Sie hat die automatische Einschreibung anscheinend nicht funktioniert. Das kommt häufiger vor.
Klicken Sie bitte unten unter "Selbsteinschreibung (Gast)" auf "Weiter" und nutzen Sie dann bitte den Selbsteinschreibeschlüssel "Gast".
Sollten Sie dennoch Probleme mit der Nutzung eines Links im Zusammenhang mit dem Tutorienprojekt oder MOAS haben, wenden Sie sich bitte an Stefan Ufer, ufer@math.lmu.de.
- Trainer/in: Stefan Ufer
- Trainer/in: Daniel Sommerhoff
- Trainer/in: Daniel Sommerhoff
- Trainer/in: Manuela Mosburger
- Trainer/in: Michael Riedmaier
- Trainer/in: Manuela Mosburger
- Trainer/in: Thea Schinkel
Das Modul vertieft die Kenntnisse der Grundlagen der Computerlinguistik. Diese Grundlagen umfassen linguistische Grundlagen (Morphologie, Syntax, Semantik), mathematische Grundlagen (Logik, Formale
Sprachen, lineare Algebra, Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie) und informatische
Grundlagen (Komplexität, Programmieren, Parsing). Die Grundlagen in
diesen drei Bereichen werden in der Übung an Beispielen konkretisiert und mittels umfangreicher Ubungsaufgaben von den Studierenden eingeübt.
- Trainer/in: Silvia Casola
- Trainer/in: Barbara Plank
- Trainer/in: Andreas Säuberli
Ausgehend von Maß- und Integrationstheorie -- wie etwa in den Analysis oder Mathematik (Physik) Vorlesungen -- werden wir komplexe Maße und Spektralmaße einführen. Die Variation eines komplexen Maßes erlaubt es oft, die Integration bezüglich eines komplexen Maßes auf den bekannten Fall zurückzuführen. Die Untersuchung dieser Maße auf Regularität ist dann ein weiterer Schritt der Formulierung und beim Beweis des Spektralsatzes für beschränkte selbstadjungierte Operatoren.
Selbsteinschreibung mit Kennwort: Spektralmaß
- Trainer/in: Heribert Zenk
- Trainer/in: Stefan Ufer
Die Vorlesung empfängt die Studierenden der Geographie im ersten Fachsemester. Sie bietet eine Einführung in die naturwissenschaftlichen Prinzipien der physischen Geographie und nivelliert damit eventuell unterschiedliches Vorwissen in dem Bereichen Mathematik, Physik, Chemie und Biologie. Ziel der Veranstaltung ist, dass Absolventen des Moduls einen Überblick über die notwendigen naturwissenschaftlichen Grundlagen sowie über Gegenstand, Methoden und Grundlagenwissen der physischen Geographie erwerben, die für eine erfolgreiche Teilnahme an den tiefergehenden Fachveranstaltungen im folgenden Studienverlauf erforderlich sind. Der integrative Charakter des Faches wird hervorgehoben, um Zusammenhänge im System Erde zu verstehen und das Erdsystem zu erfassen und zu bewerten. Themenschwerpunkte sind dabei z.B. die Geographie als wissenschaftliche Disziplin, Fragestellungen der physischen Geographie, die sich aus den Herausforderungen einer dynamischen Umwelt ergeben, Wiederholung und Vertiefung der Grundlagen der Physik, Chemie und Biologie mit Hilfe von Anwendungsbeispielen aus der physischen Geographie, Wissenschaftstheorie, Systemtheorie, Energie im Erdsystem, Einführung in das System Erde und in die Stoffkreisläufe sowie Grundlagen der Pflanzenphysiologie. Die Vorlesung wird durch eine (Vertiefungs-) Übung begleitet.
Als Leistungsnachweis dient eine Klausur (Grundlagen- und Orientierungsprüfung) am Ende des Semesters, welche die erworbenen Kenntnisse aus Vorlesung und begleitender Übung einschließt.
- Trainer/in: Tobias Hank
- Trainer/in: Benedikt Hartweg
- Trainer/in: Christoph Heinzeller
- Trainer/in: Elisabeth Probst
- Trainer/in: Alexander Sasse
- Trainer/in: Uta Schirpke
Kursbeschreibung
In dieser Vorlesung werden bedingte Erwartungswerte mithilfe des Satzes von Radon-Nikodým eingeführt und ihre wesentlichen Eigenschaften hergeleitet. Zudem werden die Grundlagen der Theorie stochastischer Prozesse in diskreter Zeit, mit einem starken Fokus auf Martingale, behandelt. Dazu werden wir uns mit relevanten Methoden aus der Maß- und Integrationstheorie befassen und insbesondere das starke Gesetz der großen Zahlen, das Null-Eins-Gesetz von Kolmogorov und die Lemmata von Borel-Cantelli beweisen.
Vorgesehen für Studierende folgender Studiengänge
- Mathematik im Bachelor und Master, Wirtschaftsmathematik im Bachelor, Theoretische und Mathematische Physik im Master
Voraussetzungen
- Kenntnisse der Stochastik und der Maß- und Integrationstheorie
Einschreibeschlüssel
- W-Theorie
- Trainer/in: Alexander Kalinin
- Trainer/in: Fabian Nolte
Modul 4: Konfrontative Bearbeitung von Traumafolgesymptomen (non-komplexe PTBS) Teil 1 am 23. und 24. Oktober 2020
Die traumafokussierte KVT nach Ehlers als Behandlungsverfahren mit hoher Evidenz wird detailliert hinsichtlich ihres empirischen und theoretischen Hintergrunds vermittelt. Die Teilnehmenden lernen insbesondere die folgenden Therapiebausteine kennen: imaginatives Nacherleben, imaginative Strategien zur Aktualisierung der Traumaerinnerung, Imagery Rescripting, kognitive Techniken und Verhaltensexperimente. Weitere Themen sind die individuelle Therapieplanung sowie der Umgang mit Schwierigkeiten in der konfrontativen Bearbeitung und Traumafolgesymptomen.
Dozent: Prof. Dr. Thomas Ehring
- Trainer/in: Thomas Ehring
- Trainer/in: Ana Semm
- Trainer/in: Larissa Wolkenstein
Modul 5: Behandlung komplexer Traumafolgestörungen einschließlich Dissoziativer Störungen Teil 1 am 15. und 16. Januar 2021
Aufbauend auf den Techniken aus Modul 2 soll das Vorgehen der DBT-PTBS vermittelt werden. Hierzu gehören folgende Aspekte: Erstellung einer Behandlungsplanung und Behandlungshierarchie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Suizidalität, Selbstverletzung, Substanzmissbrauch, Ess-Brech-Anfällen und anderen problematischen Verhaltensweisen; Erarbeitung von Techniken zur Behandlung von dysfunktionalen Verhaltensweisen, Etablierung von Alternativstrategien, Verbesserung der Emotionsregulation und der interpersonellen Fertigkeiten; Psychoedukation und Behandlung von Dissoziation; Erarbeitungen von Voraussetzungen für traumafokussierte Interventionen; Indikation und Kontraindikation für das imaginative Nacherleben; Durchführung des imaginativen Nacherlebens unter Berücksichtigung dissoziativer Symptome.
Darüber hinaus wird auf die Erstellung eines Behandlungsleitfadens für Patient*innen mit hoher Dissoziationsneigung eingegangen.
- Trainer/in: Thomas Ehring
- Trainer/in: Antonia Nauerz
- Trainer/in: Ana Semm
Deutsch zu unterrichten ist besonders wichtig, besonders schön ─ und es ist besonders anstrengend.
Und
dabei muss man noch nicht einmal an die zeitaufwändigen Korrekturen
denken. Im Rahmen eines Projekts, das die Ermittlung entscheidender
Probleme der Unterrichtsplanung im Fach Deutsch zum Ziel hat, beschreibt
ein zum Zeitpunkt der Befragung 37jähriger Gymnasiallehrer die zentrale
Herausforderung – gerade im Vergleich zu den Fächern Englisch und
Ethik, die er auch unterrichtet – so:
"Die größte
Herausforderung des Faches Deutsch und der größte Unterschied zu einer
Fremdsprache ist aus meiner Sicht die große didaktisch-methodische
Offenheit. Das beginnt bei der Jahresplanung und setzt sich vor allem
bei den großen Feldern Literaturunterricht und Schreibdidaktik fort, wo
der Lehrer unheimlich viel auswählen, verwerfen, entscheiden, anpassen
und didaktisch gestalten kann und meistens muss. Das ist Segen und Fluch
zugleich, weil es einerseits die Kreativität anspricht und großen Spaß
macht, aber andererseits – wie auch die Korrektur – sehr aufwändig ist."
Bei
fast allen befragten Lehrkräften lässt sich genau dieser Kern in ihrer
Antwort auf die Frage nach der zentralen Herausforderung entdecken: Eine
Seminarlehrerin an der Realschule berichtet, dass vor allem
Berufsanfänger große Probleme bei der Erstellung eigener
Kompetenzverteilungspläne für das Fach Deutsch haben, da in vielen
Bereichen keine chronologisch zwingende Reihenfolge des Lehrstoffes
vorgegeben sei. Das bedeute große Freiheiten, aber eben auch große
Probleme. Und eine junge Grundschullehrerin sagt, dass sie zwar in
Deutsch in der Regel nur eine Wochenstunde mehr unterrichte als in
Mathe, die Vorbereitung aber zwei- bis dreimal so viel Zeit beanspruche.
Klar wird anhand dieser Beispiele: Wer Deutsch unterrichtet, gehört zu den Lehrkräften, die am härtesten arbeiten – und das Studium bereitet auf diese speziellen Herausforderungen kaum vor. Das ist der Grund dafür, dass es diesen Podcast gibt.
- Trainer/in: Lisa Lorenz
- Trainer/in: Michael Rödel
- Trainer/in: Sebastian Wochenauer
- Trainer/in: Andreas Herz
- Trainer/in: Anian Kerscher
- Trainer/in: Wing Lo
- Trainer/in: Wiktor Mlynarski
- Trainer/in: Thomas Nägele
- Trainer/in: Sophie Kellerer
- Trainer/in: Sophie Kellerer